What Does h4831sc Mean?
What Does h4831sc Mean?
Blog Article
H1000 is on my want listing of powders in addition. It's possible the IMR Enduron collection are going to be nicely liked and I'm able to move to that for better availability.
H4831 will function within the Swift but not authentic nicely. You may under no circumstances get the pressures you would like for consistency with the .223. 760, or H414 will probably be superior but for many cause I ain't the largest enthusiast of most ball powders.
The fact that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is exactly why you are observing higher velocities acquired with that powder, in contrast to Everything you've observed with the IMR things. Also great powder, but considerably far better suited to a little bit more compact scenarios which has a little bit fewer potential.
Minnesota H4831SC is my drop by in the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am preserving the minor I have still left for fall 2021. I would commence reduced and function your way up, based on what load data you look at for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.
Anyway, I understood The 2 lbs . of H4831SC made use of exactly the same data, but I did not know regardless of whether there was just about anything diverse involving a pound of powder labeled "Extreme" and just one not so labeled. A call to Hodgdon verified which they were the truth is equivalent and the only real difference was The brand over the label.
Given that there would h4831 vs h4831sc not appear to be any "official" Load Data available for this Load, can some of you present a starting point with this mixture and issues to think about when Functioning this Load up?
Nampa, Idaho In my expertise the only authentic variation is that the shortcut meters much better by reloading gear. As soon as It is really loaded theres no purposeful variance. I've read that the shortcut could possibly have a small little bit faster burn off rate but It appears insignificant.
excaliber reported: I've identified the precise opposite to be legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 h4831sc was a considerably faster and equally correct powder in my three hundred Get Mag.
You could possibly either: one) Continue on and possess the firearm(s) shown under quickly removed from your buying cart:
You may have to produce several additional posts to receive cleared to accomplish PM's. As soon as you reach that position I would article in the classified reloading part to determine if anybody is in your area for just a trade. Click on to broaden...
Kansas Metropolis, MO I'd grab whatever is accessible at this moment. I’ve utilized both of those however with my head to load and didn’t see nearly anything various efficiency clever.
It really is likely that no even further dialogue is necessary, wherein situation we endorse setting up a whole new thread. If however you feel your response is needed you are able to continue to do this.
Can I presume that H4831 may be substituted for H4831sc h4831sc ? I understand the Actual physical change but will it have an impact on the burn off or velocity? I feel not but I am not 100% guaranteed.
I discovered that my 7mag a hundred and sixty partitions have been sub MOA with 4831sc with reduced to min expenses. I’m speaking 2700 (maybe 2800) fps, it absolutely was a lower 60s grain demand in a very Norma case. Not what I was on the lookout for, but accurate Nevertheless.